Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Composite Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Gu, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

A Comparative Study of the Impact Response of 3D Textile Composites and Aluminum Plates

Hong Hu, Baozhong Sun, Hanjian Sun, and Bohong Gu*

College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai, China

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gubh{at}dhu.edu.cn.


   Abstract

Impact damage of textile composite and aluminum are the most common phenomenon in aircrafts and high-speed vehicles as impact loadings often occur. This article presents a comparative study of the impact responses of two kinds of 3D textile composites (named as 3D spacer weft-knitted composite and 3D orthogonal woven composite) and aluminum circular plates tested with a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus. Finite element analyses of the impact behavior of the composites and aluminum were also presented to uncover the impact damage mechanisms. Furthermore, the quasi-static indentation tests were carried out for comparing the different damage modes between quasi-static and impact loading. The 3D textile composites have resin crack and fiber breakage under quasi-static indentation tests while only elasto-plastic deformation has been found in aluminum. The energy absorption of the 3D textile composite is greater than aluminum. While under impact loading, the 3D textile composites absorb lower impact energy than aluminum because the lower impact damages were found in the composite circular plate. More importantly, no impact delamination was found in both of the 3D textile composites. This manifestation of the 3D textile composites is tougher than aluminum in impact loading and more suitable for aircrafts and high-speed vehicles design.

First published on October 6, 2009
Journal of Composite Materials 2009, doi:10.1177/0021998309347577


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?