Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Composite Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarrazin, H.
Right arrow Articles by Springer, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Processing Temperature and Layup on Springback

Hugo Sarrazin

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, William F Durand Bldg., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

Beomkeun Kim

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, William F Durand Bldg., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

Sung-Hoon Ahn

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, William F Durand Bldg., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

George S. Springer

Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, William F Durand Bldg., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

Tests were performed to assess the effects of processing conditions and laminate layup on the change in shape (springback). Twelve inch long and one inch wide coupons made of Fiberite T300/976 graphite/epoxy were tested. Coupons of different layups were cured using different types of molds and different types of vacuum bagging arrangements. The curing was performed with different temperature cycles. Springback was measured from the change in shape of initially flat coupons. The results indicated the effects of the applied temperature, applied pressure, material of the mold, arrangement of the teflon surrounding the coupon, and laminate layup on springback.

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 29, No. 10, 1278-1294 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/002199839502901001
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Composite MaterialsHome page
W.-K. Jung, W.-S. Chu, S.-H. Ahn, and M.-S. Won
Measurement and Compensation of Spring-back of a Hybrid Composite Beam
Journal of Composite Materials, April 1, 2007; 41(7): 851 - 864.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Composite MaterialsHome page
Y. K. Kim and I. M. Daniel
Cure Cycle Effect on Composite Structures Manufactured by Resin Transfer Molding
Journal of Composite Materials, July 1, 2002; 36(14): 1725 - 1743.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Composite MaterialsHome page
M. S. Madhukar, M. S. Genidy, and J. D. Russell
A New Method to Reduce Cure-Induced Stresses in Thermoset Polymer Composites, Part I: Test Method
Journal of Composite Materials, November 1, 2000; 34(22): 1882 - 1904.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Composite MaterialsHome page
M. S. Genidy, M. S. Madhukar, and J. D. Russell
A New Method to Reduce Cure-Induced Stresses in Thermoset Polymer Composites, Part II: Closed Loop Feedback Control System
Journal of Composite Materials, November 1, 2000; 34(22): 1905 - 1925.
[Abstract] [PDF]