Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Composite Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karbhari, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Response of Multi-Element Foam-Filled Preform RTM Structures, II: Low-Velocity Impact and Post-Impact Crush Response

Vistasp M. Karbhari

Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0085, USA

Resin transfer molding has opened the potential for structures incorporating multi-element preform architectures and cores, tailored for combinations of requirements that would not previously have been possible in one structure. The response of foam-filled RTM structural elements to low-velocity impact and post-impact progressive crush is investigated. Six different architectures based on a stiffened plate-type structural element were tested, and comparisons of behavior prior to and after impact are made based on overall response and damage mechanisms. Differences in preform architecture are shown to result in differences in post-impact crush response through the triggering of damage modes that are architecturally driven. Failure mechanisms are seen to be driven by the use of a woven layer in the outer preform element, or through damage imparted to the central rib as a function of the damage events. Results based on the comparison of crush and post-impact crush response indicate that preform selection should be made based on architectural optimization linked to overall repeatability and uniformity of performance under a range of loading regimes for maximum efficiency in cases where structural stability and crush are important metrics of performance.

Key Words: resin transfer molding • multi-element preform • impact • progressive crush • absorbed energy • impact energy

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 29, No. 11, 1437-1457 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/002199839502901102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?