Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Composite Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Massa, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Barbero, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Strength of Materials Formulation for Thin Walled Composite Beams with Torsion

Julio C. Massa

National University of Cordoba, Argentina

Ever J. Barbero

Department of Mechanical and Aeronautic Engineering, 315 Engineering Science Building, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506

A simple methodology for the analysis of thin walled composite beams subjected to bending, torque, shear, and axial forces is developed. Members with open or closed cross section are considered. The cross section is modeled as a collection of flat. arc-circular, and concentrated area segments. Each laminated segment is modeled with the constitutive equations of classical lamination theory accounting for a linear distribution of normal and shear strains through the thickness of the walls, thus allowing for greater accuracy than classical thin walled theory when the walls are moderately thick. The geometric properties used in classical beam theory such as area, first moment of area, center of gravity, etc., are no longer used because of the variability of the materials properties in the cross section. Instead, mechanical properties such as axial stiffness, mechanical first moment of area. mechanical center of gravity, etc., are defined to incorporate both the geometry and the material properties. Warping, restriction to warping, and secondary stresses are considered. Failure predictions are made with customary failure criteria. Comparison with experimental results are presented.

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 32, No. 17, 1560-1594 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/002199839803201702


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Composite MaterialsHome page
H. A. Salim and J. F. Davalos
Torsion of Open and Closed Thin-Walled Laminated Composite Sections
Journal of Composite Materials, March 1, 2005; 39(6): 497 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and CompositesHome page
E. J. Barbero and M. Turk
Experimental Investigation of Beam-Column Behavior of Pultruded Structural Shapes
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, February 1, 2000; 19(3): 249 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]