This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dungan, F. D. Articles by Sastry, A. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Saturated and Unsaturated Polymer Flows: Microphenomena and Modeling

Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2250 G.G. Brown Building, 2350 Hayward Street, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2125, USA

A. M. Sastry

Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2250 G.G. Brown Building, 2350 Hayward Street, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2125, USAamsastry{at}umich.edu

Fabrication of large composite parts via resin impregnation necessarily involves both saturated and unsaturated flow. While Darcy’s law assumptions classically model only the saturated flow, the idea of a Darcy-type "permeability has been widely used to describe unsaturated flows as well. Differences between saturated and unsaturated resin flow through fibrous preforms have long been reported in the literature, however, and selection of permeability values for use in numerical simulation requires a clear understandingof the differences between these two flow types. Here, we present a new model for use in prediction of the ratios of these two permeabilities. Capillary effect and the fiber roughness are shown not to be dominant phenomena, as previously assumed by other workers. Instead, transverse flow into tows, which occurs after the fluid has permeated the intertow gaps, is found to produce significant differences in saturated and unsaturated flow velocities. Our model, which is based on Berman’s flow in a channel with porous walls, additionally accounts for walls reaching saturation as the flow moves axially through the reinforcement phase, and is shown to be in agreement with earlier experimental data. We also present analyses and experimental results based on atomic force microscopy on fiber roughness, showing its effects on flow to be of less importance than the tow permeation process. The investigation on roughness shows convincingly that for practical materials, roughness is not a concern in flow retardation at any scale (fiber or tow).

Key Words: permeability • saturated flow • unsaturated flow • intratow flow • intertow flow • capillarity • capillary flow • surface roughness

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 36, No. 13, 1581-1603 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0021998302036013179


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Chung Hae Park and A. Saouab Analytical Modeling of Composite Molding by Resin Infusion with Flexible Tooling: VARI and RFI processes Journal of Composite Materials, August 1, 2009; 43(18): 1877 - 1900. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, M. Moatamedi, and S.M. Grove Continuum Dual-scale Modeling of Liquid Composite Molding Processes Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, June 1, 2009; 28(12): 1469 - 1484. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Sun Kyoung Kim and I. M. Daniel Observation of Permeability Dependence on Flow Rate and Implications for Liquid Composite Molding Journal of Composite Materials, April 1, 2007; 41(7): 837 - 849. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Pillai Modeling the Unsaturated Flow in Liquid Composite Molding Processes: A Review and Some Thoughts Journal of Composite Materials, December 1, 2004; 38(23): 2097 - 2118. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Rodriguez, F. Giacomelli, and A. Vazquez Permeability-Porosity Relationship in RTM for Different Fiberglass and Natural Reinforcements Journal of Composite Materials, February 1, 2004; 38(3): 259 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]