Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Composite Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shivakumar, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bhargava, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Failure Mechanics of a Composite Laminate Embedded with a Fiber Optic Sensor

Kunigal Shivakumar

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Composite Materials Research, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, North Carolina 27411, USA, kunigal{at}ncat.edu

Anil Bhargava

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Composite Materials Research, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, North Carolina 27411, USA

A fiber optic sensor (FOS) embedded perpendicular to the reinforcing fibers causes an ‘eye’-shaped defect. The length of the eye is about 16 times the fiber optic radius (RFOS) and the height is about 2RFOS. The eye contains fiber optics in the center surrounded by an elongated resin pocket. Embedding FOS causes geometric distortion of the reinforcing fiber over a height equal to 6-8 RFOS. This defect causes severe stress concentration at the root of the resin pocket, the interface (in the composite) between the optical fiber and the composite, and at 90 to the load direction in the composite. The stress concentration is calculated by the finite element modeling of a representative micrograph. The FE results agreed reasonably with the analytical and the experimental data in the literature for a similar problem. The stress concentration in the axial direction is about 1.44 and in the transverse direction at the interface is 0.165 and at the resin pocket is 0.171. Under tensile loading, the initial failure is by transverse matrix cracking (fiber splitting) at the root of the resin pocket, then it leads to final fracture by fiber breakage. Under compression loading, the failure initiation is by interfacial cracking due to large transverse tensile stress and the final fracture is by compression. The fracture stress calculated from the analysis using the maximum stress criteria agreed reasonably with the test data.

Key Words: composite material • optical fiber sensor • stress concentration • failure mechanics • finite element model • eye shaped defect

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 39, No. 9, 777-798 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0021998305048156


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Structural Health MonitoringHome page
F. Ghezzo, Y. Huang, and S. Nemat-Nasser
Onset of Resin Micro-Cracks in Unidirectional Glass Fiber Laminates with Integrated SHM Sensors: Experimental Results
Structural Health Monitoring, November 1, 2009; 8(6): 477 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Structural Health MonitoringHome page
Y. Huang, F. Ghezzo, and S. Nemat-Nasser
Onset of Resin Micro-cracks in Unidirectional Glass Fiber Laminates with Integrated SHM Sensors: Numerical Analysis
Structural Health Monitoring, November 1, 2009; 8(6): 493 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]