Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Composite Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0021998305057378v1
40/13/1137    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Advani, S. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Experimental Validation of Dependence Map based Control in Liquid Composite Molding

Jeffrey M. Lawrence

Patrice Hughes

Center for Composite Materials and Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA

Suresh G. Advani

Center for Composite Materials and Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA; advani{at}me.udel.edu

Liquid composite molding (LCM) processes offer composite makers the environmental benefits realized by the closed molding process, and can provide better dimensional tolerances as well as part complexity. One drawback is the unpredictability in the flow behavior during the filling stage due to material and process variability that can result in resin void areas, or dry spots. Parts containing dry spots must be discarded, thus adding superfluous cost to the process. Flow control has demonstrated the ability to correct those flow anomalies to eliminate dry spots. Previous efforts developed a hybrid on-line–off-line flow controller for the LCM process and detailed the development and application of the methodology. In this study, the methodology is summarized, and the technique is applied in a manufacturing environment. A resin transfer molding workstation is developed and built to meet the needs of the control technique. A series of experiments with three different geometries with increasing complexity is conducted to validate the new flow control methodology. The results are compared with experiments without flow control to gauge the usefulness of the methodology proposed.

Key Words: resin transfer molding • mold design • active control • preform variability

This version was published on July 1, 2006

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 40, No. 13, 1137-1162 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0021998305057378


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Composite MaterialsHome page
R.J. Johnson and R. Pitchumani
Active Control of Reactive Resin Flow in a Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM) Process
Journal of Composite Materials, June 1, 2008; 42(12): 1205 - 1229.
[Abstract] [PDF]