Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Composite Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0021998306060163v1
40/17/1577    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wosu, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Hoy, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Digital Imaging and Fractographical Analyzes of Perforation-induced Delamination of Laminated Graphite-Epoxy Composite

S. N. Wosu

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA, wosu{at}engr.pitt.edu

D. Hoy

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA

A digital imaging technique for characterizing dynamic delamination in laminated composites is presented in this article. Perforation-induced delamination surfaces are generated using a conical and protruding hemispherical penetrators applied in the thickness direction using penetrating split Hopkinson pressure bar (P-SHPB). The results reveal that the extent of delamination depends strongly on the shape and geometry of the penetrator. Delamination is the dominant mode of failure for the conical hemispherical penetrator below the perforation limit energy but competes with matrix cracking at energy above the perforation limit. With the protruding penetrator, delamination mode continues to dominate at all energies. Hackles formation is not a characteristic of perforation-induced delamination.

Key Words: delamination • perforation limit energy • energy absorption • inter-laminar failure mode • hackle marks • impact energy

This version was published on September 1, 2006

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 40, No. 17, 1577-1602 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0021998306060163


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?