Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Composite Materials
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0021998306065295v1
41/6/713    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voyiadjis, G. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Almasri, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Experimental Study and Fabric Tensor Quantification of Microcrack Distributions in Composite Materials

George Z. Voyiadjis

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA; Voyiadjis{at}eng.lsu.edu

Amin H. Almasri

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA

In this study, the microcrack distributions of samples of a metal-matrix composite material (titanium aluminide (Ti-14Al-21Nb({alpha}2)) reinforced with continuous silicon carbide (SiC) (SCS-6) fibers) are measured experimentally, and then quantified using the fabric tensor approach. The laminated composite material samples have two lay-up configurations: [0/90]s and [±45]s. These samples are tested under uniaxial tension up to different levels of loads, to understand how microcrack distributions develop with applied loads. The [±45]s samples are shown to have more microcracks and a wider range of orientations of microcracks than the [0/90]s samples. The microcracks can be divided into two categories: fiber microcracks and fiber-interface microcracks. Distributions of both types are shown to be similar in shape but different in orientation. In addition, microcrack distributions weighted by the microcrack lengths are presented. Fabric tensors of zero, second, fourth, sixth, eighth, and tenth order are used to approximate these microcrack distributions. Fabric tensors are seen to give a very good approximation when eighth or tenth-order fabric tensors are used for both fiber and fiber-interface microcrack distribution types. Finally, damage variable and damage evolution relations are derived in terms of the fabric tensor based on a thermodynamically consistent framework.

Key Words: microcracks • fabric tensors • composite materials

This version was published on March 1, 2007

Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 41, No. 6, 713-745 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0021998306065295


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?